holding that the district court did not err in finding that plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm by way of "los[t] revenues and goodwill"
Summary of this case from Everett Laboratories, Inc. v. Breckenridgue Pharm.No. 96-282.
October 7, 1996.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 80 F. 3d 1553.
holding that the district court did not err in finding that plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm by way of "los[t] revenues and goodwill"
Summary of this case from Everett Laboratories, Inc. v. Breckenridgue Pharm.holding that “an adequate post-deprivation hearing will satisfy the requirements of the Due Process Clause” in “cases in which pre-deprivation process was impracticable because the plaintiff was deprived of property as the result of a[n allegedly] ... unauthorized act of a state employee”
Summary of this case from Crystal Ice-Bridgeton, LLC v. City of Bridgetonaddressing substantive due process and equal protection violations under § 1983
Summary of this case from Babino v. Borough of Oaklandstating that if it had to interpret a claim under the ICCPR regarding cruel treatment, it would do so under the standards developed for the Eighth Amendment
Summary of this case from Ralk v. Lincoln CountyFull title:BIO-TECHNOLOGY GENERAL CORP. ET AL. v. GENENTECH, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 7, 1996
217 F.3d at 361-63.SeeO'Dell v. Netherland, 521 U.S. 151, 156, 117 S.Ct. 1969, 1973, 138 L.Ed.2d 351 (1997),…
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation v. Estee Lauder Co.Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. v. Avia Group Int'l, Inc., 222 F.3d 951, 955 (Fed. Cir. 2000); accord, e.g.,…