From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Binner v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 22, 2011
No. 1017 C.D. 2011 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Dec. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1017 C.D. 2011

12-22-2011

John W. Binner, Petitioner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent


BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, President Judge HONORABLE P. KEVIN BROBSON, Judge HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge OPINION NOT REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION BY PRESIDENT JUDGE LEADBETTER

John W. Binner, pro se, petitions for review of the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which adopted the decision of the Referee that Binner was ineligible for benefits. We affirm.

The facts, as found by the Referee, are as follows. Binner was employed as a custodian for the Lebanon County Area Vo-Tech School until November 17, 2010. On that day, he was confronted by his supervisors, who accused him of taking unauthorized breaks during his night shifts. Binner was told that he could resign, or his termination would be recommended to the school board at its next meeting. The day after this discussion, Binner submitted a letter of resignation.

The Referee found that Binner was ineligible for benefits because he voluntarily left his employment. The Referee cited this court's decision in Fishel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 674 A.2d 770 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996), in which this court held that a teacher who resigned rather than face a formal termination hearing in front of a school board had voluntarily left her employment. This court held that because the teacher could only be formally terminated by the school board, discharge was less than a certainty at the time of her resignation.

On appeal, the Board adopted the Referee's opinion in full and affirmed. An appeal to this court followed.

Before this court, Binner disputes that he voluntarily left his employment, and that he committed misconduct on the job. However, this court is bound by the Board's factual findings when they are supported by substantial evidence of record. Graham v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 840 A.2d 1054 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004). Both the testimony and documentary evidence in this case strongly support the Referee's finding, later adopted by the Board, that Binner submitted a letter of resignation rather than face a termination proceeding in front of the school board. In addition, the Referee correctly applied Fishel in determining that, by submitting his letter of resignation, Binner voluntarily terminated his employment.

When a claimant voluntarily terminates employment, that claimant is ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits unless he left for necessitous and compelling reasons. Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. § 802(b); Nolan v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 797 A.2d 1042 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002). Because Binner has identified no such reasons, the Board correctly concluded that he was ineligible. Therefore, there is no reason for this court to consider Binner's arguments regarding his alleged misconduct.

Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended. --------

For all the foregoing reasons, we affirm.

/s/_________

BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,

President Judge ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2011, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the above-captioned matter is hereby AFFIRMED.

/s/_________

BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,

President Judge


Summaries of

Binner v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 22, 2011
No. 1017 C.D. 2011 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Dec. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Binner v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

Case Details

Full title:John W. Binner, Petitioner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review…

Court:COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 22, 2011

Citations

No. 1017 C.D. 2011 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. Dec. 22, 2011)