From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bingham v. Southwest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 14, 2020
No. 3:20-cv-809-N-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:20-cv-809-N-BN

08-14-2020

DOYLE WAYNE BINGHAM (#126074982), Plaintiff, v. LASALLE SOUTHWEST, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court therefore DENIES Plaintiff Doyle Wayne Bingham's motion for default judgment and for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 16].

SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2020.

/s/_________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bingham v. Southwest

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 14, 2020
No. 3:20-cv-809-N-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2020)
Case details for

Bingham v. Southwest

Case Details

Full title:DOYLE WAYNE BINGHAM (#126074982), Plaintiff, v. LASALLE SOUTHWEST, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 14, 2020

Citations

No. 3:20-cv-809-N-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2020)

Citing Cases

Espinoza v. Texas Tech Administration

As such, the complaint has not been ordered served on any defendant.” Bingham v. LaSalle Sw., No.…

Espinoza v. Tex. Tech Admin.

As such, the complaint has not been ordered served on any defendant." Bingham v. LaSalle Sw., No.…