Opinion
October, 1896.
Order reversed, without costs to either party. Held, that the judgment was premature because the time to answer did not begin to run until January 1, 1896. All concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Bingham v. Northrop
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Summaries of
Bingham v. Northrop
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for
Bingham v. Northrop
Case Details
Full title:Eunice Bingham, Mary E. Arthur and Charles W. Bingham, Respondents, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1896
Citations
9 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)