From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bingham v. Lasalle Sw. Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 5, 2020
No. 3:20-cv-1857-X-BN (N.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:20-cv-1857-X-BN

11-05-2020

DOYLE WAYNE BINGHAM, #126074982, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. LASALLE SOUTHWEST CORRECTIONS, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case [Doc. No. 4]. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court therefore DISMISSES Plaintiffs' "class action" complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) without prejudice to any Plaintiff filing his own, signed amended complaint and either paying the full filing fee or filing his own motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis no later than 14 days after entry of this order.

SO ORDERED this 5th day of November 2020.

/s/_________

BRANTLEY STARR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bingham v. Lasalle Sw. Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 5, 2020
No. 3:20-cv-1857-X-BN (N.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Bingham v. Lasalle Sw. Corr.

Case Details

Full title:DOYLE WAYNE BINGHAM, #126074982, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. LASALLE SOUTHWEST…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Nov 5, 2020

Citations

No. 3:20-cv-1857-X-BN (N.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2020)