Bingham v. Bingham

2 Citing cases

  1. Holleyman v. Holleyman

    2003 OK 48 (Okla. 2003)   Cited 25 times
    Explaining that Rule 1.14 regulates the enforcement procedure of 12 O.S. § 978 and these provisions mandate the prevailing party's recovery of taxable costs including court reporter expenses at the conclusion of appellate litigation

    1998 OK 18, 955 P.2d 722. 1981 OK CIV APP 26, ¶ 19, 629 P.2d 1297, 1301.Id.

  2. State Dept. of Human Services v. T.D.G

    1993 OK 26 (Okla. 1993)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that contract between mother and putative father was void against public policy and thus did not prevent state from establishing support obligations

    Parkey v. Parkey, 371 P.2d 711, 714 (Okla. 1962); Donahoe v. Alcorn, 188 Okla. 305, 108 P.2d 786, 789 (1940); Bynum v. Bynum, 184 Okla. 36, 84 P.2d 424, 427 (1938); Ahrens v. Ahrens, 67 Okla. 147, 169 P. 486-87 (1917); Bingham v. Bingham, 629 P.2d 1297, 1299 (Okla. 1981); Raczynski v. Raczynski, 558 P.2d 425, 429 (Okla. Ct. App. 1976).