From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bilic v. United Technologies

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 14, 1992
821 S.W.2d 135 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 60083.

January 14, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

Ray B. Marglous, Julia L. Gray, Ray B. Marglous, P.C., St. Louis, for claimant/appellant.

Larry D. Valentine, Riethmann Goessing, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.


ORDER


Claimant appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against her former employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bilic v. United Technologies

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jan 14, 1992
821 S.W.2d 135 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Bilic v. United Technologies

Case Details

Full title:ANNA BILIC, CLAIMANT/APPELLANT, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, EMPLOYER/RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 14, 1992

Citations

821 S.W.2d 135 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)