From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bilhorn v. Lipman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 13, 1979
69 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

April 13, 1979

Appeal from the Monroe Supreme Court.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: This is the fourth appeal involving pretrial proceedings in this action brought against a physician, Earl S. Lipman (Lipman), a pharmacy, Mead Drugs, Inc. (Mead), and a drug manufacturer, SmithKline Corporation (SmithKline), for injuries allegedly resulting from the use of the drug, stelazine, by plaintiff Grace Bilhorn. Special Term granted a motion made by defendant Lipman on November 17, 1978 for a physical examination of plaintiff Grace Bilhorn even though a statement of readiness had been filed on January 18, 1978. The granting of the motion was improper as defendant Lipman made no showing of special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances to support his untimely application (see Giddens v. Moultrie, 66 A.D.2d 993 and Doll v Kleinklaus, 66 A.D.2d 1003). Plaintiff Grace Bilhorn is now 76 years of age and has been physically examined by physicians on behalf of defendant SmithKline on three occasions. The record shows that their medical reports, as well as the medical reports of plaintiff's examining physicians, are available to defendant Lipman. Therefore, the denial of defendant Lipman's motion for a physical examination should not impair his ability to present a defense at trial.


Summaries of

Bilhorn v. Lipman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 13, 1979
69 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Bilhorn v. Lipman

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE BILHORN et al., Appellants, v. EARL S. LIPMAN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1979

Citations

69 A.D.2d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)