From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bilenkise v. Ferruccio

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District
Nov 1, 1922
118 A. 925 (Conn. 1922)

Opinion

Argued October 27th, 1922

Decided November 1st, 1922.

ACTION to recover damages for injuries to the person and automobile of the plaintiff, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County, Booth, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $1,330, and appeal by the defendant. No error.

John M. Comley, for the appellant (defendant).

Charles S. Brody, with whom was Harry A. Goldstein, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The defendant claims that the subordinate facts found by the trial court do not support its ultimate conclusion that the plaintiff at the time of the accident was in the exercise of due care. In our opinion this conclusion was not only amply justified by the subordinate facts, but was the only conclusion which could have been reasonably drawn from them.


Summaries of

Bilenkise v. Ferruccio

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District
Nov 1, 1922
118 A. 925 (Conn. 1922)
Case details for

Bilenkise v. Ferruccio

Case Details

Full title:HIRSCH BILENKISE vs. JOSEPH FERRUCCIO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District

Date published: Nov 1, 1922

Citations

118 A. 925 (Conn. 1922)
118 A. 925