From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bigler v. Woodley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Aug 4, 2017
Case No. 3:17cv180-MCR-CJK (N.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17cv180-MCR-CJK

08-04-2017

DIANA BIGLER, Plaintiff, v. BILL WOODLEY, CEO of DB USA Corporation and Deputy CEO of Deutsche Bank Americas, a human wrongdoer, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On March 22, 2017, the undersigned entered an order (doc. 2) advising plaintiff her complaint was inadequate and allowing her 30 days in which to correct the deficiencies through the filing of an amended complaint. Plaintiff submitted a document titled "Trial by Jury," which was returned as deficient. See doc. 3. The undersigned entered another order (doc. 4) allowing plaintiff a final opportunity to file an amended complaint, correcting the deficiencies in her original complaint, and advising that in the event she failed to do so within 14 days of the date of the order, the undersigned would recommend, without further notice, that the matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with an order of the court.

More than 14 days have passed and plaintiff has failed to respond to the order. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the Clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 4th day of August, 2017.

/s/ _________

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only , and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate judge's findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.


Summaries of

Bigler v. Woodley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Aug 4, 2017
Case No. 3:17cv180-MCR-CJK (N.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Bigler v. Woodley

Case Details

Full title:DIANA BIGLER, Plaintiff, v. BILL WOODLEY, CEO of DB USA Corporation and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 4, 2017

Citations

Case No. 3:17cv180-MCR-CJK (N.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2017)