From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Big Spring Tractor Co. v. Scott

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland
May 30, 1952
249 S.W.2d 703 (Tex. Civ. App. 1952)

Opinion

No. 2928.

May 30, 1952.

Appeal from the County Court, Howard County, Walter Grice, County Judge

Guilford L. Jones, Big Spring, for appellant.

Morrison Morrison, Big Spring, for appellee.


Big Spring Tractor Company sued Robert C. Scott for debt and caused a writ of garnishment to be served on the City National Bank of Colorado City, Texas. The Bank answered that Scott had on deposit an amount in excess of the debt sued for. Scott intervened in the garnishment proceeding and moved to quash the writ on the ground that he owned real estate in Texas, subject to execution, more than sufficient to satisfy plaintiff's debt and that plaintiff's affidavit for garnishment was false.

The trial court found, in effect, that plaintiff's said affidavit was false and for that reason the writ of garnishment was defective and should be quashed. The court, thereupon, rendered judgment quashing and setting aside all garnishment proceedings, assessing all costs against plaintiff, `and that said intervenor (Scott) go hence with his costs without day.' Plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff's only point is that the court erred in holding that the writ of garnishment was defective and should be quashed because of the alleged falsity of the affidavit. Said point is sustained. The validity of a garnishment depends, not upon the truth of facts stated in the affidavit, but upon the fact that the affidavit contains the statement required by statute. Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 4076. First Nat. Bank of Munday v. Guinn, Tex.Civ.App., 57 S.W.2d 880, 882; First Nat. Bank in George West v. Frost Nat. Bank of San Antonio, Tex.Civ.App., 142 S.W.2d 555, 556 (W.D.C.J.); Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. First Nat. Bank of Waurika, Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Writ Dis.); Walden v. Locke, Tex.Civ.App., 49 S.W.2d 832, 835; (Writ Ref.); Smith v. Sealy State Bank of Sealy, Tex.Civ.App., 60 S.W.2d 486, 488; 3A Tex.Jur., 147.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Big Spring Tractor Co. v. Scott

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland
May 30, 1952
249 S.W.2d 703 (Tex. Civ. App. 1952)
Case details for

Big Spring Tractor Co. v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:BIG SPRING TRACTOR CO. v. SCOTT

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland

Date published: May 30, 1952

Citations

249 S.W.2d 703 (Tex. Civ. App. 1952)

Citing Cases

Deal v. Sexton

The fallacy in the position seems to us to be in supposing that the living children can represent the unborn…

Andrew Brown Company v. Painters Warehouse, Inc.

Under Texas law, the truth of a garnisher's affidavit may not be controverted for the purpose of abating the…