Opinion
2:22-cv-00909-CDS-DJA
12-15-2022
BIG ROCK ASSETS MANAGEMENT LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff v. NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, a National Association; DOES I-X; Inclusive Defendants
Akerman LLP MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ. SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. DONNA WITTIG Attorneys, for Bank of America, N.A. ANDREW BAO & ASSOCIATES ANDREW A. BAO, ESQ. Attorneys for Big Rock Assets Management, LLC
(Removed from Eighth Judicial District of Nevada, Case No. A-22-852207-C)
Akerman LLP
MELANIE D. MORGAN, ESQ.
SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ.
DONNA WITTIG
Attorneys, for Bank of America, N.A.
ANDREW BAO & ASSOCIATES
ANDREW A. BAO, ESQ.
Attorneys for Big Rock Assets Management, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
Big Rock Assets Management, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) stipulate that Plaintiff shall have up to and including January 10, 2023, to file its response to Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Complaint, which is currently due on December 15, 2022.
Good cause exists to grant this extension. Since the first extension was requested, the parties have discussed parameters that involve dismissing this action with prejudice. One party has agreed to the parameters and approval is pending with the other party. Thus, a response to the motion to dismiss may not necessary.
This is the parties' second request for an extension of this deadline and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.