Opinion
Civil Action 20-2113-KSM
01-07-2022
ORDER
KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.
AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Big Red Management Corp's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 41), Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. No. 42), Defendant's Reply Brief in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 43), Plaintiff's Sur-Reply in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. No. 44), Defendant's Notice of Supplemental Authorities in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 48), Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Notice of Supplemental Authorities (Doc. No. 49), Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Doc. No. 50), Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Notices of Supplemental Authority (Doc. No. 52), Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Notices of Supplemental Authorities (Doc. No. 53), Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Its First and Second Notices of Supplemental Authorities (Doc. No. 55), Defendant's Second Notice of Supplemental Authorities in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 51), and Defendant's Third Notice of Supplemental Authorities in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 54), it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 40) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.