From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biezer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 23, 2003
117 S.W.3d 677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81214

September 23, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable David C. Mason.

Kent Denzel, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Patrick Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.



ORDER


Pietro Biezer appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Biezer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 23, 2003
117 S.W.3d 677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Biezer v. State

Case Details

Full title:PIETRO BIEZER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 23, 2003

Citations

117 S.W.3d 677 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)