From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biever Motor Car Company v. Chrysler Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 1, 1952
199 F.2d 758 (2d Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 102, Docket 22491.

Argued November 13, 1952.

Decided December 1, 1952.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; Carroll C. Hincks, Judge.

From a summary judgment for the defendant in an action by The Biever Motor Car Company against the Chrysler Corporation for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals.

Herbert L. Emanuelson, New Haven, Conn. (James G. Austin, Hornell, N.Y., Richard J. Bookhout and Sterling P. Harrington, Oneonton, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Cummings Lockwood, Stamford, Conn., Raymond E. Hackett, Stamford, Conn., William H. Timbers, New York City, and George F. Lowman, Stamford, Conn. (Francis S. Bensel, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Bushwick-Decatur Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 675.


Summaries of

Biever Motor Car Company v. Chrysler Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Dec 1, 1952
199 F.2d 758 (2d Cir. 1952)
Case details for

Biever Motor Car Company v. Chrysler Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BIEVER MOTOR CAR COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Dec 1, 1952

Citations

199 F.2d 758 (2d Cir. 1952)

Citing Cases

Kuhl Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.

Defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute…