From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bierhalter v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 10, 2020
No. 04-19-00358-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 10, 2020)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00358-CR

06-10-2020

Wesley Byron BIERHALTER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas
Trial Court No. 18-2010-CR-B
Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice AFFIRMED

Bierhalter was convicted by a jury of one count of indecency with a child by contract and two counts of sexual assault of a child. Bierhalter's court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Bierhalter with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Bierhalter did not file a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's request to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Bierhalter wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Bierhalter must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Bierhalter must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

Bierhalter v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jun 10, 2020
No. 04-19-00358-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Bierhalter v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wesley Byron BIERHALTER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jun 10, 2020

Citations

No. 04-19-00358-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 10, 2020)