From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bien v. Saul

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 23, 2021
1:20-CV-212-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-CV-212-H-BU

08-23-2021

CHAREILA L. BIEN, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge John R. Parker made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case on July 30, 2021. See Dkt. No. 15. Judge Parker recommended that the Court deny plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. at 3. No objections to the FCR were filed. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge. Thus, the Court denies plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis and orders her to pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days from the issuance of this order. The Court warns plaintiff that it will dismiss her complaint if she fails to pay the filing fee. Bey v. Chicory Court Madison III LP, No. 3:21-CV-66-X-BT, 2021 WL 673180, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2021) ("The Court will dismiss the plaintiffs complaint in the future if he fails to either pay the $402.00 filing fee . . . .")

So ordered.


Summaries of

Bien v. Saul

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 23, 2021
1:20-CV-212-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Bien v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CHAREILA L. BIEN, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 23, 2021

Citations

1:20-CV-212-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2021)

Citing Cases

Escalante v. O'Malley

“In making an [IFP] determination, courts should consider whether payment of the filing fee will result in…