From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bielling v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 27, 1973
89 Nev. 112 (Nev. 1973)

Summary

In Bielling, the State had not pleaded the requisite elements of criminal negligence in its information to establish a vehicular manslaughter charge (the information there, unlike here, did not allege murder).

Summary of this case from Boyes v. State

Opinion

No. 7129

March 27, 1973

Appeal from an order denying pre-trial petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Leonard I. Gang, Judge.

Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Thomas D. Beatty, Assistant Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City, Roy A. Woofter, District Attorney, and Charles L. Garner, Chief Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


In this appeal from the denial of pre-trial habeas relief appellant's sole contention is that the information, charging him with involuntary manslaughter, a felony under NRS 200.070, is fatally defective. We agree.

Respondent concedes that the information filed herein only charges appellant with ordinary negligence. While many states have enacted legislation which permit convictions in vehicular homicide cases without the showing of criminal negligence, Nevada has not done so. "The authorities are agreed, in the absence of statutory regulations denouncing certain acts as criminal, that in order to impose criminal liability for a homicide caused by negligence, there must be a higher degree of negligence than is required to establish negligent default on a mere civil issue." People v. Penny, 285 P.2d 926, 937 (Cal. 1955). Cf. State v. Lewis, 59 Nev. 262, 91 P.2d 820 (1939).

"In every crime or public offense there must exist a union, or joint operation of act and intention, or criminal negligence." NRS 193.190. In order to properly charge appellant with the offense of involuntary manslaughter, the information must specify the acts of criminal negligence upon which the state is relying to try to obtain a conviction. See Simpson v. District Court, 88 Nev. 654, 503 P.2d 1225 (1972).

We reverse, without prejudice to a new and sufficient accusation.


Summaries of

Bielling v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 27, 1973
89 Nev. 112 (Nev. 1973)

In Bielling, the State had not pleaded the requisite elements of criminal negligence in its information to establish a vehicular manslaughter charge (the information there, unlike here, did not allege murder).

Summary of this case from Boyes v. State
Case details for

Bielling v. Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:JAMES FARRELL BIELLING, APPELLANT, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Mar 27, 1973

Citations

89 Nev. 112 (Nev. 1973)
508 P.2d 546

Citing Cases

Boyes v. State

Thus, the district court properly interpreted the legal application of Morris as pertaining to second degree…

Sheriff v. Standal

The indictment or information must specify the acts of criminal conduct upon which the state is relying.…