Bielecki v. Max Hertz Leather Co.

Full title: JULIUS BIELECKI, APPELLANT, v. MAX HERTZ LEATHER COMPANY, RESPONDENT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

131 A. 921 (N.J. 1926)

131 A. 921

Opinion

Submitted October 29, 1925 —

Decided February 1, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 375.

For the appellant, Jacob L. Newman.

For the respondent, Joseph C. Paul.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.