From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biederman v. CoreCivic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Jun 20, 2019
CV 18-000126-GF-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Jun. 20, 2019)

Opinion

CV 18-000126-GF-BMM-JTJ

06-20-2019

DONALD DEAN BIEDERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CORECIVIC, MDOC, and DOJ EMPLOYEES OF CROSSROAD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Donald Dean Biederman ("Biederman"), a pro se prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed a Motion for a 90-day Restraining Order (Doc. 10) seeking injunctive relief with respect to the conditions of his confinement at Crossroads Correctional Center.

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Order and Findings and Recommendations in this matter on May 21, 2019. (Doc. 11.) Judge Johnston recommended that Biederman's Motion for a 90-day Restraining Order be denied. (Doc. 11 at 8.) Judge Johnston determined that Biederman had been moved from Crossroads Correctional Center to Montana State Prison. Id. An inmate's transfer to another prison renders moot their request for injunctive relief unless there exists some evidence of an expectation of being transferred back. Id. (citations omitted). Biederman lacks standing to obtain injunctive relief regarding the conditions of confinement at Crossroads Correctional Center.

Biederman timely filed an objection on June 6, 2019. (Doc. 13.) Biederman is entitled to de novo review of those findings and recommendations to which he specifically has objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Absent specific objection, this Court reviews findings and recommendations for clear error. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted).

Biederman's objection asks the Court to address his Response (Doc. 8) filed November 9, 2018, to Judge Johnston's October 22, 2018, Order. (Doc. 6.) Judge Johnson's order directed Biederman to show cause for his Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 1.) Judge Johnston granted Biederman's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on May 21, 2019. (Doc. 11 at 13.) The Court already has addressed Biederman's motion and it has been granted. The Court reviews Judge Johnson's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. The Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations.

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston's Order and Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 11) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Biederman's Motion for a 90-day Restraining Order (Doc. 10) is DENIED.

DATED this 20th day of June, 2019.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Biederman v. CoreCivic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Jun 20, 2019
CV 18-000126-GF-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Jun. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Biederman v. CoreCivic

Case Details

Full title:DONALD DEAN BIEDERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CORECIVIC, MDOC, and DOJ EMPLOYEES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 20, 2019

Citations

CV 18-000126-GF-BMM-JTJ (D. Mont. Jun. 20, 2019)