From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bidstrup v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 7, 2023
No. 10942-22 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 7, 2023)

Opinion

10942-22

12-07-2023

JESPER L. BIDSTRUP & ANNA M. BIDSTRUP, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

EMIN TORO JUDGE.

On December 5, 2023, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision (Doc. 11). However, upon review of the Proposed Stipulated Decision, the Court notes that the caption is incorrect, insofar as the docket number includes an "S." The Court is therefore unable to process the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision.

In view of the foregoing, and to give effect to the agreement of the parties in this case, it is hereby

ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision (Doc. 11) filed December 5, 2023, is recharacterized as the parties' Settlement Stipulation. It is further

ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is no deficiency in income tax due from, nor overpayment due to, petitioners for the taxable year 2019; and

That there is no penalty due from petitioners for the taxable year 2019 under the provisions of I.R.C. § 6662(a).


Summaries of

Bidstrup v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 7, 2023
No. 10942-22 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Bidstrup v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JESPER L. BIDSTRUP & ANNA M. BIDSTRUP, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Dec 7, 2023

Citations

No. 10942-22 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 7, 2023)