From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biddle v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 1, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1119 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-1119 JFM (HC)

11-01-2012

RICKIE A. BIDDLE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Presently pending is petitioner's June 22, 2012 motion to stay these proceedings pending exhaustion of state court remedies as to additional claims. Respondent will be directed to respond to that motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent shall submit a response to petitioner's motion to stay within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order.

______________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Biddle v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 1, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-1119 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Biddle v. Knipp

Case Details

Full title:RICKIE A. BIDDLE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-1119 JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2012)