From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bickram v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 29, 2021
18-CV-1160 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

18-CV-1160 (KMK)

06-29-2021

REGINALD BICKRAM, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge:

Reginald Bickram (“Plaintiff”) brings this Action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”), which denied his application for disability insurance benefits and/or supplemental security income benefits. (Dkt. No. 7.) The Commissioner moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground that the Complaint is barred by the time limitation specified in § 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Dkt. Nos. 17, 19.)

The case was referred to the Honorable Andrew E. Krause (“Judge Krause”). On June 9, 2021, Judge Krause issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Commissioner's Motion be denied. (Dkt. No. 42.) The parties have not filed any objections to the R&R.

Judge Krause provided notice that, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, objections to the R&R were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy. (R&R 14-15.)

When no objections are filed, the Court reviews an R&R on a dispositive motion for clear error. See Andrews v. LeClaire, 709 F.Supp.2d 269, 271 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); Eisenberg v. New Eng. Motor Freight, Inc., 564 F.Supp.2d 224, 226 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finding no substantive error, clear or otherwise, adopts the R&R.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, dated June 9, 2021, is ADOPTED in its entirety.

ORDERED that the Parties meet and confer regarding whether this case should be remanded to the Commissioner. The Parties must notify the Court on how they wish to proceed by filing a letter within 14 days of issuance of this Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bickram v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 29, 2021
18-CV-1160 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Bickram v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD BICKRAM, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

18-CV-1160 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

Rios v. Kijakazi

When no objections are filed, the Court reviews an R&R on a dispositive motion for clear error. See Bickram…

Morgan v. Kijakazi

at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2022); see also Brito v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 19-CV-10631, 2022 WL 1002698, at…