From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bickley v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Aug 19, 2014
4:08-cv-05806-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2014)

Opinion

          MARLIN & SALTZMAN, [LEAD COUNSEL FOR DEDICATED/INTERMODAL DRIVERS], Stanley D Saltzman, Esq., Louis M. Marlin, Esq., Marcus J. Bradley, Esq., Christina A. Humphrey, Esq., Agoura Hills, California.

          HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, LEAD COUNSEL FOR REGIONAL DRIVERS, Steve W. Berman, Esq., Lee M. Gordon, Esq., Pasadena, California,

          Paul T. Cullen, Esq., THE CULLEN LAW FIRM, APC, Agoura Hills, California,

          Peter M. Hart, Esq., LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART, Los Angeles, California,

          Kenneth H. Yoon, Esq., LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON, Los Angeles, California,

          Eric Honig, Esq., LAW OFFICE OF ERIC HONIG, Marina del Rey, California,

          Steve W. Berman, Esq., HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP, Seattle, Washington,

          William Rehwald, Esq., Lawrence Glasner, Esq., Daniel Chaleff, Esq., REHWALD GLASNER & CHALEFF, Woodland Hills, California, Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Putative Class.


          FURTHER JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PROPOSED ORDER

          JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

         Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby submit the following Further Joint Stipulation to Continue the Further Case Management Conference, which was recently continued by the Court based on the Stipulation of the Parties, and re-scheduled for September 12, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. (See Order, Document No. 218).

         WHEREAS, the Parties previously submitted a Stipulation to Continue the Further Case Management Conference (Document No. 217);

         WHEREAS, co-lead counsel for the Plaintiffs, Stanley D. Saltzman (the undersigned), erred when drafting the Stipulation, by failing to request a specific date for the continued hearing, such that the date selected by the Court turned out to be in conflict with other counsel's schedules of court appearances and other business matters;

         WHEREAS, accordingly, and with apologies to the Court for having to burden it with a second request to continue the Further Case Management Conference, the Parties now jointly request that the CMC be re-scheduled to take place on September 26, 2014, with the Joint Statement of the Parties to be filed no later than September 19, 2014.

         NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties herein, through their counsel of record, that the Further Case Management Conference currently scheduled for September 12, 2014, be continued by two weeks to September 26, 2014, with the Joint Statement of the Parties to be filed by September 19, 2014.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         (PROPOSED) ORDER

         Now before the Court is a Further Joint Stipulation to Continue the Further Case Management Conference (Doc ___). After reviewing the Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefor,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Further Case Management Conference currently scheduled for September 12, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. is continued to September 26, 2014, at 11:00 a.m., and the Joint Statement of the Parties shall be filed no later than September 19, 2014.


Summaries of

Bickley v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Aug 19, 2014
4:08-cv-05806-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Bickley v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS BICKLEY, MICHAEL D. PATTON, RAYMOND GREWE, DENNIS VANHORN, and…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 19, 2014

Citations

4:08-cv-05806-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2014)