Summary
explaining that the failure by the ALJ to include a relevant limitation in the hypothetical question put to the vocational expert did not require reversal where omission was harmless
Summary of this case from Crespo v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Opinion
Civil No. 02-59-B-S
December 31, 2002
DAVID A. CHASE, ESQ., MacDONALD, CHASE SZEWCZYK, BANGOR, ME, for plaintiff RANDALL BICKFORD.
JAMES M. MOORE, ESQ., BANGOR, ME, ESKUNDER BOYD, ESQ., ASSISTANT REGIONAL COUNSEL, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL, REGION 1, BOSTON, MA, for defendant SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER.
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed November 20, 2002, the Recommended
Decision is accepted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the commissioner's decision is VACATED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge.