From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bibb v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Aug 30, 2023
No. 13689-23S (U.S.T.C. Aug. 30, 2023)

Opinion

13689-23S

08-30-2023

JIMMY B. BIBB & DANA M. BIBB, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On July 23, 2023, the petition commencing this case was electronically filed. When a petition is electronically filed with the Court, the combination of the username and password of the individual efiling the petition serves as the signature of that individual. See the DAWSON User Guides on the Court's website, www.ustaxcourt.gov. The petition in this case was electronically filed using an email address belonging to steve@costelle.com and thus the petition is treated as having been signed by Stephen Costelle. A review of the record shows that Stephen Costelle is not admitted to practice before the Court and there is a jurisdictional problem in the case. The Tax Court, unlike the Internal Revenue Service, does not recognize powers of attorney. See Rules 24(a), 200; see also Ruggere v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 979, 989 (1982). Stephen Costelle will not be associated with this case, and we encourage petitioners' representative to review the Court's admissions requirements. The Court has prepared Q&A's on the subject "Representing a Taxpayer Before the U.S. Tax Court. A copy of these Q&A's are attached to this order. The Court also encourages practitioners and non-attorneys seeking admission to practice before the Court to consult "Guidance for Practitioners" on the Court's website at www.ustaxcourt.gov/practitioners.html. At this juncture and upon review of the entire record, the email address at steve@costelle.com used to electronically file the petition will be disabled from the record.

Therefore, in order for this Court potentially to acquire jurisdiction to consider this case, it is necessary to obtain a Ratification of Petition bearing petitioners' original signature and ratifying the petition previously filed. Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that, on or before October 13, 2023, petitioners shall file with the Court a Ratification of Petition ratifying and affirming the filing of the Petition on their behalf. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to this Order a form that petitioners may use to comply with this Order. It is further

ORDERED that, in addition to regular service, the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Stephen Costelle at the address listed for him on page 2 of the petition. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to the copy of this Order the Court's Q&As on the subject "Representing a Taxpayer Before the U.S. Tax Court". It is further

The Court encourages all litigants to register for DAWSON (Docket Access Within a Secure Online Network), the U.S. Tax Court's electronic filing and case management system. By registering, litigants may electronically file and view documents in their Tax Court case. If you currently file in paper or receive paper service from the Court, petitioners and not power of attorneys must register from DAWSON by sending an email request to dawson.support@ustaxcourt.gov.

RATIFICATION OF PETITION

____, have read the Petition filed with the Court on___ and do hereby ratify and affirm the filing of said document by affixing our signatures hereto.

REPRESENTING A TAXPAYER BEFORE THE U.S. TAX COURT

The United States Tax Court, which is separate and independent from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), has certain requirements that must be met before someone can represent another person or entity before the Court. Unlike the IRS, the Court does not recognize powers of attorney.

Who can represent me in my Tax Court case?

• You may represent yourself or hire an attorney or other person who is admitted to practice before the Court. You will know that a person is admitted to practice before the Court because that individual will have a Tax Court bar number. All representatives who practice before the Tax Court are subject to the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct.

What if the person I want to represent me is not admitted to practice before the Court?

• If your representative is an attorney, he or she may submit an application to seek admission to the Court's bar. Upon admission, the attorney will be assigned a Tax Court bar number and can then represent you in the case.

• If your representative is not an attorney, that person can only be admitted to practice before the Court by taking a written examination given every two years and by meeting other Court requirements. Information concerning the application for admission and the Court's nonattorney exam may be found on the Court's website, www.ustaxcourt.gov.

May I represent the estate or trust of a deceased taxpayer before the Court without hiring a representative?

• Yes, if you are a duly authorized fiduciary or representative of the deceased taxpayer. For example, a state court of competent jurisdiction may appoint an individual as an executor, administrator, or personal representative of a deceased person. If you are a fiduciary, you should file a “Motion for Substitution of Party and to Change Caption” and attach a copy of the state court-issued letters of administration or letters testamentary. The motion must list the case name and docket number.

May I represent an incompetent or incapacitated taxpayer before the Court?

• Yes, if you are a fiduciary duly appointed under state law, such as a guardian or conservator. If you have been appointed to serve as a conservator or guardian of the petitioner, you may file a Motion to Substitute Party and attach a copy of any documents providing proof of your appointment. The motion must list the case name and docket number.

In the alternative, the Court may permit you to be recognized as petitioner's “next friend” by filing a Motion to Be Recognized as Next Friend stating:

1. that petitioner cannot prosecute this case without assistance;

2. that the person seeking appointment as next friend would like to be recognized as petitioner's next friend, he or she has a significant relationship with petitioner, and would represent petitioner's best interests;

3. that there is no other person better suited to serve as next friend; and

4. the names and addresses of persons (e.g., spouse, parent, or siblings) who may have an interest in this matter.

You must include as an attachment to the motion a current statement from the petitioner's personal physician (or equivalent support) indicating that the petitioner is not competent to prosecute his or her case without assistance. You must also state in the motion whether anyone is known to have an objection to the Court's recognition of you as the petitioner's next friend. The motion must list the case name and docket number.

Please visit the Court's website, www.ustaxcourt.gov, for additional resources and information.


Summaries of

Bibb v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Aug 30, 2023
No. 13689-23S (U.S.T.C. Aug. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Bibb v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY B. BIBB & DANA M. BIBB, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Aug 30, 2023

Citations

No. 13689-23S (U.S.T.C. Aug. 30, 2023)