From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bianco v. Globus Med., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 19, 2015
618 F. App'x 1032 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2015-1193

10-19-2015

SABATINO BIANCO, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC., Defendant-Appellant

PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by EMILY CURTIS JOHNSON; CHARLES EVERINGHAM, IV, Dallas TX; MICHAEL SIMONS, Austin, TX; IFTIKAHR AHMED, Houston, TX; STEVEN ZAGER, New York, NY. ROBERT M. PALUMBOS, Duane Morris, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS W. SANKEY, Houston, TX; KRISTINA CAGGIANO KELLY, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:12-cv-00147-WCB, Circuit Judge William C. Bryson.

JUDGMENT

PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by EMILY CURTIS JOHNSON; CHARLES EVERINGHAM, IV, Dallas TX; MICHAEL SIMONS, Austin, TX; IFTIKAHR AHMED, Houston, TX; STEVEN ZAGER, New York, NY. ROBERT M. PALUMBOS, Duane Morris, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS W. SANKEY, Houston, TX; KRISTINA CAGGIANO KELLY, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 19, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Bianco v. Globus Med., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 19, 2015
618 F. App'x 1032 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Bianco v. Globus Med., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SABATINO BIANCO, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 19, 2015

Citations

618 F. App'x 1032 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Implicit, LLC v. NetScout Sys.

Federal Rule of Evidence 103 requires a timely and specific objection to the introduction of improper…