Opinion
3:23-cv-00014-LRH-CLB
04-14-2023
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN Plaintiff v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Defendant
Law Offices of Michael E. Langton Richard S. Edelman, (petition pursuant to LR IA 11-2 granted) Mooney, Green, Saindon, Murphy and Welch, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Brotherhood Of Railroad Signalmen
Law Offices of Michael E. Langton
Richard S. Edelman, (petition pursuant to LR IA 11-2 granted) Mooney, Green, Saindon, Murphy and Welch, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Brotherhood Of Railroad Signalmen
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN FOR EXTENSIONOF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen ("BRS") hereby moves the Court for an extension of foe briefing schedule in this case on the parties' cross- motions for summary judgment. This requested extension is not opposed by the Union Pacific Railroad ("UP"). Further, the parties have agreed to propose to the court that they each file only one more brief on the cross-motions, with each brief to be within the page limits permitted for briefs in opposition to summary judgment motions; the instant motion for an extension of the briefing schedule is consistent with that agreement. In further support of this motion, BRS states as follows:
1. BRS filed its motion for summary judgment on January 27,2023.
2. UP filed its opposition to BRS' motion and a cross-motion for summary judgment on April 7, 2023.
3. Currently, BRS' reply to UP's opposition brief is due on April 21, 2023 and BRS' opposition to UP's summary judgment motion is due on April 28,2023.
4. As noted above, the parties have agreed that they each need to file only one more brief.
5. With UP's consent, BRS therefore moves the Court for an extension of its time to file its opposition brief, and for UP to file its reply brief (with the page limits allowed for opposition briefs so the parties will be subject to the same page limitations) as follows:
a. BRS will file its opposition to UP's summary judgment motion on or before May 8,2023;
b. UP will file its reply in support of its cross-motion for summary judgment on or before June 9, 2023.
Based upon the foregoing, BRS respectfully requests that this motion be granted, and that BRS be granted leave to file its opposition to UP's summary judgment motion on or before May 8,2023; and that UP be granted leave to file its reply in support of its summary judgment motion on or before June 9, 2023 (subject to the page limit for opposition briefs).
ORDER
For good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.