BHC Interim Funding II, L.P. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

1 Citing case

  1. Roggio v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

    Civil Action No. 9-1733 (TJK) (D.D.C. Oct. 25, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    See ECF No. 62-6 at 2-4, 20-28. Courts in this Circuit have consistently held that where "a complaint alleges entirely new legal theories that are different than those reflected in the administrative proof of claim, the Court is without subject matter jurisdiction to consider the new causes of action." Jahn v. FDIC, 828 F. Supp. 2d 305, 317 (D.D.C. 2011); see also Westberg, 741 F.3d at 1308-09; BHC InterimFunding II, L.P. v. FDIC, 851 F. Supp. 2d 131, 138-39 (D.D.C. 2012) (collecting cases). Roggio does not meaningfully respond to the FDIC's argument on this point.