From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bhasin v. Pathak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
Case No. EDCV 13-00293-VAP (OPx) (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)

Summary

taking judicial notice of records on USPTO website, as they were public records

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Netflix, Inc.

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 13-00293-VAP (OPx)

05-03-2013

SUNIL BHASIN, M.D., Plaintiff, v. NERRY PATHAK AKA AASHIT PATHAK, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the Order filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered.

______________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bhasin v. Pathak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2013
Case No. EDCV 13-00293-VAP (OPx) (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)

taking judicial notice of records on USPTO website, as they were public records

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Netflix, Inc.
Case details for

Bhasin v. Pathak

Case Details

Full title:SUNIL BHASIN, M.D., Plaintiff, v. NERRY PATHAK AKA AASHIT PATHAK, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 3, 2013

Citations

Case No. EDCV 13-00293-VAP (OPx) (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Netflix, Inc.

The Court considers the remaining documents because they are indisputably authentic, relevant to Plaintiffs'…