Bhan v. Nielsen

Full title: CHANDER BHAN, Petitioner v. KIRSTEN NIELSEN, Respondent

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-00941-P (W.D. La. Nov. 24, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-00941-P

11-24-2020

CHANDER BHAN, Petitioner v. KIRSTEN NIELSEN, Respondent

JUDGE DAVID C. JOSEPH

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 9), noting the absence of objection thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 5) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers, this 24^th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE