From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bhambra v. Newell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2009
No. CIV. S-09-1097 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV. S-09-1097 LKK GGH PS.

June 4, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff has not paid the fee ordinarily required to file an action in this court, and has filed an incomplete application to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff has failed to provide an answer to the request for information about his current wages, including pay period, and name and address of employer. Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit either the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.

Even had plaintiff completed this court's form application to proceed in forma pauperis, and demonstrated a proper basis to proceed without prepayment of funds, this court would not permit the action to proceed upon the present complaint.

The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally "frivolous or malicious," fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th Cir. 1984). The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous where it is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327. The critical inquiry is whether a constitutional claim, however inartfully pleaded, has an arguable legal and factual basis. See Jackson v. Arizona, 885 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 1989); Franklin, 745 F.2d at 1227.

A complaint must contain more than a "formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action;" it must contain factual allegations sufficient to "raise a right to relief above the speculative level." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1965 (2007). "The pleading must contain something more . . . than . . . a statement of facts that merely creates a suspicion [of] a legally cognizable right of action."Id., quoting 5 C. Wright A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure 1216, pp. 235-235 (3d ed. 2004). In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the court must accept as true the allegations of the complaint in question, Hospital Bldg. Co. v. Rex Hospital Trustees, 425 U.S. 738, 740 (1976), construe the pleading in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and resolve all doubts in the plaintiff's favor. Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1969).

The court finds the allegations in plaintiff's "complaint" so vague and conclusory that it is unable to determine whether the current action is frivolous or fails to state a claim for relief. The court has determined that the complaint does not contain a short and plain statement as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). Although the Federal Rules adopt a flexible pleading policy, a complaint must give fair notice and state the elements of the claim plainly and succinctly. Jones v. Community Redev. Agency, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir. 1984). Plaintiff must allege with at least some degree of particularity overt acts which defendants engaged in that support plaintiff's claim. Id. Because plaintiff has failed to comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2), the complaint must be dismissed. The court will, however, grant leave to file an amended complaint.

If plaintiff chooses to amend the complaint, plaintiff must demonstrate how the conditions complained of have resulted in a deprivation of plaintiff's constitutional rights. See Ellis v. Cassidy, 625 F.2d 227 (9th Cir. 1980). Also, the complaint must allege in specific terms how each named defendant is involved. There can be no liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless there is some affirmative link or connection between a defendant's actions and the claimed deprivation. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976);May v. Enomoto, 633 F.2d 164, 167 (9th Cir. 1980); Johnson v. Duffy, 588 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978). Furthermore, vague and conclusory allegations of official participation in civil rights violations are not sufficient. Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

In addition, plaintiff is informed that the court cannot refer to a prior pleading in order to make plaintiff's amended complaint complete. Local Rule 15-220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading. This is because, as a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Once plaintiff files an amended complaint, the original pleading no longer serves any function in the case. Therefore, in an amended complaint, as in an original complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently alleged.

Finally, the complaint as submitted is overly length at 52 pages long. On amendment, plaintiff shall limit his pleading to 20 pages.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, either a completed application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

2. Plaintiff shall also submit an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND AFFIDAVIT 28 USC § 1915

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of California Plaintiff, v. CASE NUMBER: Defendant. I, ________________________________________, declare that I am the (check appropriate box) [] petitioner/plaintiff/movant [] other in the above-entitled proceeding: that in support of my request to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs under I declare that I am unable to pay the costs of these proceedings and that I am entitled to the relief sought in the complaint/petition/motion. In support of this application, I answer the following questions under penalty of perjury: 1. Are you currently incarcerated? [] Yes [] No (If "No," go to Part 2) If "Yes," state the place of your incarceration ________________________________________ Are you employed at the institution? _____ Do you receive any payment from the institution? _____ Attach a ledger sheet from the institution(s) of your incarceration showing at least the past six months' transactions. 2. Are you currently employed? [] Yes [] No a. If the answer is "Yes," state the amount of your take-home salary or wages and pay period and give the name and address of your employer. b. If the answer is "No," state the date of your last employment, the amount of your take-home salary or wages and pay period and the name and address of your last employer. 3. In the past 12 twelve months have you received any money from any of the following sources? a. Business, profession or other self-employment [] Yes [] No b. Rent payments, interest or dividends [] Yes [] No c. Pensions, annuities or life insurance payments [] Yes [] No d. Disability or workers compensation payments [] Yes [] No e. Gifts or inheritances [] Yes [] No f. Any other sources [] Yes [] No If the answer to any of the above is "Yes," describe, on the following page, each source of money and state the amount received and what you expect you will continue to receive. 4. Do you have any cash or checking or savings accounts? [] Yes [] No If "Yes," state the total amount. ____________________ 5. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles or any other thing of value? [] Yes [] No If "Yes," describe the property and state its value. 6. List the persons who are dependent on you for support, state your relationship to each person and indicate how much you contribute to their support. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct. ______________________________ __________________________________________________ Date Signature of Applicant NOTICE TO PRISONER: A prisoner seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees shall submit an affidavit stating all assets. In addition, a prisoner must attach a statement certififed by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. If you have multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in multiple institutions, attach one certified statement of each account.


Summaries of

Bhambra v. Newell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 4, 2009
No. CIV. S-09-1097 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Bhambra v. Newell

Case Details

Full title:HARJIT BHAMBRA, Plaintiff, v. CLIFFORD NEWELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 4, 2009

Citations

No. CIV. S-09-1097 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2009)