Opinion
No. 07-71631.
Argued and Submitted March 12, 2010.
Filed March 23, 2010.
Martin Avila Robles, Esquire, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Regina Byrd, Esquire, Yedidya Cohen, Trial, OIL, Lauren Fascett, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A096-152-279.
Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Parminder Singh Bhagtana, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.
The BIA determined that Bhagtana's failure to submit his fingerprints by the deadline imposed by the IJ was sufficient reason to deny his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.47(c). The agency, however, did not have the benefit of our intervening decision in Cui v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1289 (9th Cir. 2008), which held that refusing to continue proceedings for fingerprint processing may be an abuse of discretion. We remand for the agency to reconsider its denial of Bhagtana's application in light of Cui. See id. at 1292-95; see also Karapetyan v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 1118, 1129-32 (9th Cir. 2008).