From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.H. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 13, 2023
2:23-cv-00564-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Jul. 13, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00564-JCM-DJA

07-13-2023

B.H., a minor by and through her Parent, Sirbrina Bell, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; SCARLETT PERRYMAN, individually, and in her official capacity as School Associate Superintendent of Clark County School District; RYAN LEWIS, individually, and in his official capacity as Plaintiff's former Principal; KATHRYN FITZGERALD, individually, and in her capacity as Plaintiff's former teacher of record; DOES I-X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I -X, inclusive, Defendants.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS RYAN LEWIS AND KATHRYN FITZGERALD'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION d FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL

(FIRST REQUEST)

The Parties, Plaintiff B.H., a minor by and through her Parent, Sirbrina Bell (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, Gregg A. Hubley, Esq. and Christopher A.J. Swift, Esq., of Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Torrijos and Marianne C. Lanuti, Esq., of the Law Offices of Marianne Lanuti, Defendants Ryan Lewis (“Lewis”) and Kathryn Fitzgerald (“Fitzgerald”) (hereinafter “Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, and Defendants Clark County School District and Scarlett Perryman (“Joining CCSD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Thomas D. Dillard, Esq. and Stephanie Barker, Esq., of Olson Cannon Gormley & Stoberski, and hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following:

1. The Parties agree that, due to scheduling conflicts limiting Defendants Lewis and Fitzgerald counsel's ability to timely and adequately file their Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal, the deadline for Defendants Lewis and Fitzgerald to file their Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Dismissal shall be extended one weeks, from July 13, 2023, to July 20, 2023.
2. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.
3. The Parties have submitted that the instant stipulation is being offered in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

ORDER

The above Stipulation is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

B.H. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 13, 2023
2:23-cv-00564-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Jul. 13, 2023)
Case details for

B.H. v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:B.H., a minor by and through her Parent, Sirbrina Bell, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 13, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00564-JCM-DJA (D. Nev. Jul. 13, 2023)