From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.F. Goodrich Rubber Company v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

April, 1930.


Order in so far as it opens defendant's default and permits the service of an answer modified by striking out the words "to abide the event" as the same relates to the allowance of fifteen dollars costs. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent; answer to be served within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. It was error to direct that costs of the motion should abide the event. ( Richardson v. Sun Publishing Co., 20 App. Div. 329. ) Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to reverse.


Summaries of

B.F. Goodrich Rubber Company v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

B.F. Goodrich Rubber Company v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:B.F. GOODRICH RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. F. STUART ALEXANDER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 737 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)