From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beyrent v. Hubschman

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 13, 2024
2:23-cv-920-JLB-KCD (M.D. Fla. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-920-JLB-KCD

03-13-2024

GARRETT F.X. BEYRENT, Plaintiff, v. HARRISON HUBSCHMAN, SAMUEL HUBSCHMAN, TERYL BRZESKI and PAWEL BRZESKI, Defendants.


REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

Kyle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff Garrett Beyrent sues several defendants for allegedly selling land held by multiple family trusts without his consent and without paying him proceeds from the sales. (Doc. 1 at 1.) The Court dismissed Beyrent's initial complaint sua sponte, citing numerous pleading deficiencies. (Doc. 4.) In doing so, the Court directed Beyrent to file an amended complaint by February 23, 2024. (Id.) Beyrent did not comply.

Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations.

So, to be safe, the Court extended the deadline for Beyrent to update his complaint to March 6, 2024. (Doc. 5.) In doing so, the Court warned Beyrent that continued failure to comply with its prior order would result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. (Id.) Again, Beyrent did not respond.

Ignoring the Court's orders is grounds for dismissal. “A plaintiff's failure to prosecute diligently can result in dismissal if the plaintiff in response to an order to show cause fails to demonstrate due diligence and just cause for delay.” M.D. Fla. R. 3.10. Similarly, the Court has the “inherent power” to dismiss a case for lack of prosecution under its authority to manage its docket. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962).

Beyrent has not diligently prosecuted this case because he ignored the Court's order to file an amended complaint. This failure shows his lack of interest in prosecuting his case. Thus, the Court should dismiss this matter without prejudice.

RECOMMENDED.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1. To expedite resolution, parties may file a joint notice waiving the 14-day objection period.


Summaries of

Beyrent v. Hubschman

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 13, 2024
2:23-cv-920-JLB-KCD (M.D. Fla. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Beyrent v. Hubschman

Case Details

Full title:GARRETT F.X. BEYRENT, Plaintiff, v. HARRISON HUBSCHMAN, SAMUEL HUBSCHMAN…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-920-JLB-KCD (M.D. Fla. Mar. 13, 2024)