Opinion
21-55990
04-13-2022
BEYOND BLOND PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. COMEDYMX, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff-Appellant, and EDWARD HELDMAN III, an individual; COMEDYMX, INC., a Nevada corporation, Defendants-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiffs, v. MICHELLE JUSTICE, Third-party-defendant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Argued and Submitted April 6, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California No. 2:20-cv-05581-DSF-GJS Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding 1
Before: SCHROEDER and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and McNAMEE, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM
CMX appeals the district court's order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction and request for reconsideration of the district court's earlier order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of Appellee Beyond Blond. We have jurisdiction to review both orders because they are inextricably intertwined. See Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc., 739 F.2d 1415, 1418 n.4 (9th Cir. 1984).
We affirm. The district court correctly ruled that CMX does not have any likelihood of success on the merits, and we agree with the reasons given by the district court.
All pending motions are DENIED.
AFFIRMED. 2 --------- Notes: This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.