From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bey v. North Carolina

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jan 10, 2022
1:21CV45 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

1:21CV45

01-10-2022

NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent.


ORDER

Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge.

On November 2, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections (Doc. 9) within the time limit prescribed by § 636.

The court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 6), which is affirmed and adopted.

Petitioner also filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 8), but that filing does not address the issue set out in the Recommendation. To the extent that Petitioner is seeking to file an action different from one under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, he should do so on the proper forms.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed for failure to obtain an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit authorizing this district court to consider the current Petition as is required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244, and that, there being neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. 1


Summaries of

Bey v. North Carolina

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jan 10, 2022
1:21CV45 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Bey v. North Carolina

Case Details

Full title:NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

1:21CV45 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2022)