From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BEY v. GROSTEFFON

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 17, 2010
CASE NO. 3:10CV0161 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10CV0161.

March 17, 2010


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER


Plaintiff pro se Aayan Naim Bey brings this action against Defendants Tim Grosteffon and 24/7 Bail Bonds alleging that on January 20 and 21, 2010, Grosteffon, a bail bondsman, threatened Plaintiff and his family. Also, a threatening poster bearing his likeness and personal information from 24/7 Bail Bonds had been placed in a mailbox at Plaintiff's exwife's home. He invokes 18 U.S.C. § 1725 entitled "Postage Unpaid on Deposited Mail Matter."

Plaintiff did not include a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(1).

Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982) (per curiam), the district court is required to dismiss an in forma pauperis action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) if it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or if it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 608-09 (6th Cir. 1997). For the reasons stated below, this action is dismissed pursuant to § 1915(e).

The federal statute raised by the Plaintiff in the caption of his complaint, 18 U.S.C. § 1725 is a criminal statute. A private citizen has no authority to bring a civil action in federal court. Zukowski v. Bank of America, 2009 WL 2132620 * 2 (S.D. Ohio, Jul. 7, 2009). Only a grand jury can indict a criminal defendant. Id.

Furthermore, 28 U.S.C. 1332(a) provides:
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between —
(1) citizens of different states; . . .

Plaintiff and Defendants are citizens of the State of Ohio. Diversity of citizenship does not exist. Thus, this Court has no jurisdiction.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. This action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BEY v. GROSTEFFON

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 17, 2010
CASE NO. 3:10CV0161 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2010)
Case details for

BEY v. GROSTEFFON

Case Details

Full title:AAYAN NAIM BEY Plaintiff, v. TIM GROSTEFFON, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 17, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10CV0161 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2010)