From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bey v. Consedine

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Sep 16, 2014
No. 89 EM 2014 (Pa. Sep. 16, 2014)

Opinion

No. 89 EM 2014 No. 90 EM 2014 No. 91 EM 2014

09-16-2014

PATRICIA BEY, Petitioner v. MICHAEL CONSEDINE, GARY WINKER, FRANK DOCHNAL, ED B. RUST, PAMELARN AUSTIN, CAROYLN MORRIS, JAMES JOHN, YEN T. LUCAS, MAUREEN STASRA, VIVISHA L. BARNES, JODI VERDI, MICHELLE DECRISTO & SUE MURRAY, Respondents


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.


Summaries of

Bey v. Consedine

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Sep 16, 2014
No. 89 EM 2014 (Pa. Sep. 16, 2014)
Case details for

Bey v. Consedine

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA BEY, Petitioner v. MICHAEL CONSEDINE, GARY WINKER, FRANK DOCHNAL…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 16, 2014

Citations

No. 89 EM 2014 (Pa. Sep. 16, 2014)