From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bey v. Adams

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 19, 2022
22-CV-2593 (PAE) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-2593 (PAE) (RWL)

07-19-2022

VICKY WARE BEY, Plaintiff, v. ERIC ADAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff's filings at Dkts. 77, 79-82 are not procedurally appropriate and violate this Court's Order at Dkt. 72 regarding the documents that may be filed by Plaintiff while Defendants' motion to dismiss is pending. Plaintiff shall not file anything further on the docket unless directly related to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Failure to comply with this or any order of the Court may result in sanctions, including dismissal of Plaintiff's case with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bey v. Adams

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 19, 2022
22-CV-2593 (PAE) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Bey v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:VICKY WARE BEY, Plaintiff, v. ERIC ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 19, 2022

Citations

22-CV-2593 (PAE) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2022)