From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bevis v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 2, 1937
176 So. 833 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)

Opinion

8 Div. 445.

November 2, 1937.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lauderdale County; Chas. P. Almon, Judge.

Dalton Bevis and another were convicted of unlawfully manufacturing whisky and of being in possession of a still, and they appeal.

Affirmed.

Henry D. Jones, of Florence, for appellants.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The indictment in this case contains two-counts. First, charged that the defendants with two others, not here tried, did unlawfully manufacture whisky, and the second count charged the same parties with being in possession of a still.

The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, as charged in the indictment as against both defendants, and sentence was properly passed.

We have carefully read and considered the testimony in this case. There were no prejudicial errors in the admission of testimony, and there was sufficient evidence tending to prove the guilt of the parties to justify the verdict.

Charge A refused to the defendants was amply covered in the court's oral charge.

Charges C and D, being the affirmative charge as to each count, were properly refused.

We find no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Bevis v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 2, 1937
176 So. 833 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)
Case details for

Bevis v. State

Case Details

Full title:BEVIS et al. v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 2, 1937

Citations

176 So. 833 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)
176 So. 833