From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Jan 5, 2006
163 F. App'x 6 (1st Cir. 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-1704.

January 5, 2006.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE; [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge].

Robert T. Bevill on brief pro se.

R. Matthew Cairns and Ransmeier Spellman, P.C. and Mark D. Hinderks and Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP on brief for appellee.

Before Boudin, Chief Judge, Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.


After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Among other problems, the appellant has no standing to litigate claims that belong to a corporation. Moreover, he has no right to litigate claims in this circuit that are integral to a suit already filed elsewhere, and he makes no showing that the actions are distinct. See, e.g., Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153-154 (1979) (describing the deleterious effects of repetitive suits);Congress Credit Corp. v. AJC Intern., Inc., 42 F.3d 686, 689 (1st Cir. 1994) (repetitive actions may be dismissed); Gonzalez v. Banco Cent. Corp., 27 F.3d 751, 275-6 (1st Cir. 1994).

Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).


Summaries of

Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Jan 5, 2006
163 F. App'x 6 (1st Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT T. BEVILL, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit

Date published: Jan 5, 2006

Citations

163 F. App'x 6 (1st Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Bevill v. Sprint Communications Co., L.P.

October 2, 2006.Reported below: 163 Fed. Appx. 6.Certiorari…