Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Co. v. Best Brands Consumer Prods.

Full title: BEVERLY HILLS TEDDY BEAR COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BEST BRANDS CONSUMER…

Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 14, 2022

1:19-cv-3766-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-cv-3766-GHW

07-14-2022

BEVERLY HILLS TEDDY BEAR COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BEST BRANDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. and BEST BRANDS SALES COMPANY, LLC, Defendants.

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge.

ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge.

On July 14, 2022, the Court held a teleconference to discuss Defendants' motion to compel third-party GennComm LLC's (“GennComm”) response to a subpoena. Dkt. No. 238. For the reasons articulated on the record during that conference, Defendants' motion to compel is denied. In addition, as discussed on the record during that conference, should GennComm continue to assert mediation privilege over documents created after October 19, 2020, it is ordered to supplement its privilege log and provided an affidavit describing pertinent facts to that privilege assertion no later than July 28, 2022.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. No. 238.

SO ORDERED.