From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beverley v. Breeze

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 8, 2024
1:24-cv-149 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 8, 2024)

Opinion

1:24-cv-149

07-08-2024

JAMES BEVERLEY, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM BREEZE, Attorney, Defendant.


ORDER

On April 18, 2024, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 4, 5.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by Section 636.

Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 4), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for being frivolous or malicious or for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, as well as for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be filed contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Beverley v. Breeze

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 8, 2024
1:24-cv-149 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Beverley v. Breeze

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BEVERLEY, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM BREEZE, Attorney, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Jul 8, 2024

Citations

1:24-cv-149 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 8, 2024)