From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bevan v. Cowart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 9, 2005
916 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 2D04-1744.

May 6, 2005. Rehearing Denied June 9, 2005.

Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Lee County; John E. Duryea, Jr., Acting Circuit Judge.

Jane Elizabeth Bevan, pro se.

Jeffrey D. Fridkin and Jacqueline J. Buyze of Grant, Fridkin, Pearson, Athan Crown, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.


We affirm without comment the trial court's order enjoining Jane Elizabeth Bevan from filing additional petitions for repeat violence injunctions against Claudia Cowart without prior court approval but write to address the issue of appellate attorney's fees. "A litigant who wants to pursue a claim for appellate attorney's fees is required to file a motion in the appellate court under [Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure] 9.400(b), stating the legal basis for the claim." Rados v. Rados, 791 So.2d 1130, 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Phillips, 775 So.2d 921 (Fla. 2000)). Cowart requested attorney's fees in her answer brief. However, she failed to file a separate motion in accordance with rule 9.400(b). Accordingly, we deny Cowart's request for attorney's fees.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bevan v. Cowart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 9, 2005
916 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Bevan v. Cowart

Case Details

Full title:Jane Elizabeth BEVAN, Appellant, v. Claudia COWART, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 9, 2005

Citations

916 So. 2d 822 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)