From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BETZ v. BOGERT

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 31, 2009
No. CIV-08-1475-DLR-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 31, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV-08-1475-DLR-MJW.

August 31, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery responses. Doc. No. 54. Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED. The motion was not filed until four (4) months after the discovery cut-off. Hence, the motion is untimely. The original interrogatory and request for production as to which Plaintiffs seek responses were vague. Plaintiffs could and should have clarified them long ago. Finally, at this point, the discovery sought is moot because summary judgment has already been granted in favor of Defendant City and County of Denver and the discovery is not relevant to the one remaining claim against Defendant Bogert.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BETZ v. BOGERT

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 31, 2009
No. CIV-08-1475-DLR-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 31, 2009)
Case details for

BETZ v. BOGERT

Case Details

Full title:LISA MARIE BETZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DENVER POLICE OFFICER THOMAS…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 31, 2009

Citations

No. CIV-08-1475-DLR-MJW (D. Colo. Aug. 31, 2009)