Opinion
No. 2D14–460.
07-23-2014
Roy BETTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Roy Betts, pro se.
Roy Betts, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Strickland v. State, 437 So.2d 150 (Fla.1983) ; Figueroa v. State, 84 So.3d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; McNeil v. State, 993 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; Sweet v. State, 987 So.2d 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; Blocker v. State, 968 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Waiter v. State, 965 So.2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Nedd v. State, 855 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; Williams v. State, 836 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; Pitts v.. State, 832 So.2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Walker v. State, 639 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
ALTENBERND, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.