From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Betton v. Vasquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 31, 2014
CASE NO. CV 14-4210-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 14-4210-AG (PJW)

12-31-2014

MICHAEL BETTON, Petitioner, v. P.L. VASQUEZ, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that it erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 31, 2014.

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Betton v. Vasquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 31, 2014
CASE NO. CV 14-4210-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Betton v. Vasquez

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BETTON, Petitioner, v. P.L. VASQUEZ, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 31, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. CV 14-4210-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2014)