From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bettencourt v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 7, 2011
No. CIV S-08-01105 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-01105 GEB GGH P.

October 7, 2011


ORDER


On October 4, 2011, the Court of Appeals referred this matter to the district court "for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith."

A review of this court's records reflects that, on July 1, 2008, petitioner paid the filing fee for this petition, and that this court never granted petitioner in forma pauperis status.

This court is therefore not able to determine whether in forma pauperis status should continue, or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and accordingly declines to rule on the referral.

The Clerk shall serve this order on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Appeal No. 11-17325.

DATED: October 6, 2011


Summaries of

Bettencourt v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 7, 2011
No. CIV S-08-01105 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Bettencourt v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL BETTENCOURT Petitioner, v. D. K. SISTO, et al. Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-01105 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)